While the MOJ project timeline was too short to highlight an official impact on offending, the project focused on targeting the right young people and engagement with YOTs and other stakeholders. To this end the project was successful in engaging with almost 8,000 young people experiencing a number of inequalities and who are often underserved. For example:
More than 400 projects submitted applications for funding and 220 projects were awarded funding after an intensive review process to provide a SportPlus approach to supporting young people in or at risk of entering the youth justice system.7,832 young people were involved in the programme with a total of 68,741 attendances during the intervention period.
Football was the most provided sport (68 per cent of organisations), followed by boxing (50 per cent), multi-sport (48 per cent) and gym fitness (42 per cent). In some projects the choice of sport was driven by consultation with the young people. Projects also integrated the ‘plus’ activities into their work. ‘Plus’ activities included mentoring, formal or informal workshops or discussions about areas such as consequences of involvement in crime or gangs, drugs and alcohol, the role of a community and making healthy and positive choices.
In terms of reach, of the 7,832 young people engaged 82 per cent came from the most deprived communities within the bottom four IMD deciles. Most participants (88 per cent) were aged between 10 and 17 years and 48 per cent were aged between 13 to 15 years old. Most participants (77 per cent) were male and 22 per cent were female, whilst 44 per cent of young people were from an ethnically diverse background including 18 per cent from a black background. Additionally, 12 per cent of young people engaged in the programme had learning difficulties.
Of the organisations involved: 88 per cent engaged young people excluded from school or college, 76 per cent engaged young people with mental health issues, 63 per cent engaged young people associated with gangs and 57 per cent engaged with young people in care/care leavers. More than half of the organisations engaged young people who had been arrested or cautioned in the last three months whilst 44 per cent of organisations engaged with young people who had been a victim of abuse. Other ‘vulnerabilities’ included: substance misuse, parents with addictions, Special Educational Needs, bereavement, sexual exploitation, learning difficulties, disabilities, being groomed into gangs, missing episodes, and homelessness.
In terms of the sources of formal referral routes, the majority came from educational establishments (82 per cent), this was then followed by youth justice services (39 per cent), early help hubs (23 per cent) and the police (23 per cent). It is encouraging that 88per cent of organisations stated that they were working with young people who were not attending or who had been excluded from school or college as not attending school is associated with offending and being recruited to gangs. Informal referrals are valuable in helping to recruit ‘at risk’ young people who would not choose to take part in more formal intervention programmes as well as those who might not be known to statutory agencies. Delivery organisations reported that engagement levels had improved from an average of 2.7 at the start of the project to 3.3 at its conclusion.